Category : FDA News

Now, Here’s a Snappy Read

For those who might have thoughts the FDA was kidding about surveilling tobacco products, here is something in black and white for your reading pleasure:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) intends to award contracts to State Agencies to assist in inspecting retail establishments that sell cigarettes and/or smokeless tobacco products and in surveillance of other entities that fall under the scope of the provisions that will be cited in the request for proposal (RFP).

You can find other enjoyable reading at the FDA’s BizOpps page.

And, uh, oh, yes, if you would like to be a surveillance cop for the Tobacco Police, you can also register at the site above.

Happy reading!

This Just In

As they say in the entertainment world, “This just in.”

Go here to read public comments on the federal law that is being considered that will either place pipe tobacco in with the Roll Your Own, or carve out a different niche for pipe tobacco.

From the comments I have read (and I did not read all of them), the majority want pipe tobacco left alone. Tax the RYO folks up the wazoo but leave pipe tobacco where it is.

Most of the posts that I read are extremely well done, which leads me to believe they were written by pipe smokers, the mind workers of the world!

However, I did read a missive from an ex-cigarette smoker who said enough is enough. Leave pipe tobacco alone. It was from a female, at that.

Now, all we gotta do is hope that someone in the Tobacco Tax Bureau is actually reading the email comments!

My experience with the federal government, however,  is that they get all these fancy, and expensive reports from the experts, and then put them on a shelf somewhere to gather dust.

But, I still believe in a place called Hope!

I don’t believe I said that.

News Tidbits

Boy, have I fallen behind. I want to catch you up on some FDA  and other news tidbits, so here goes:

First, check out the video at http://www.capitolconnection.net/capcon/fda/fda083010_launch.htm\

It is the latest on the Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee meeting last month (Aug. 30).

While at the FDA site, you can peruse the people on the committee roster here

The City Council in Ocean City, Md., is thinking over a smoking ban: OCEAN CITY — A possible smoking ban for Ocean City’s beach won’t appear on the town’s municipal ballot in October, but resort officials say they will hold a public hearing about it following the election.

You can read all about it here

Well, you might expect this in Hollywood. The city of West Hollywood’s council is now going to reconsider its ban on outdoor smoking, after many of the restaurants and other businesses put in patios for their smoking patrons. The city is considering making it illegal to smoke outside.

Give me a break!

Read it here

You can read a whole host of towns that are considering outdoor smoking bans. Go here

This news is nothing but trouble: WOOD DALE, IL – Several U.S. tobacco retailers are selling deeply discounted roll-your-own-cigarettes, taking advantage of a federal tax loophole, the Wall Street Journal reports, a practice that has attracted scrutiny from regulators and tobacco companies.

You can find the story here

Oh, yeah. Check this one out from the UK: Smoke ban ‘is main cause’ of pub losses

I hope you are pulling for the Indians on this one: NY Cigarette Tax Plans Raise Reservation Tensions

The Germans may face what U.S. smokers are going through: German Government May Introduce Higher Tobacco Tax, Bild Newspaper Reports

Connecticut merchants contribute more than expected to state revenue, but sell fewer cigarettes: Cigarette Tax Increase Boosts State’s Revenue

The next time you check out, you best check the bill: Hotel guest fumes over smoking bill

Now, here is a real twist: MOSCOW — Smoke and drink more, Russia’s finance minister Alexei Kudrin urged citizens on Wednesday, explaining that higher consumption would help lift tax revenues for spending on social services. You can find the story here

By the way, that same story says alcohol kills 500,000 Russians a year. Hmmm, I wonder how that stacks up with the CDC’s tobacco statistics?

FDA Getting Closer to Permanent Rules

Some notes and thoughts on the recent news from the Food and Drug Administration, an agency that is targeting tobacco, but can’t seem to keep the nation’s food supply safe.

As you may know, the FDA is drafting guidelines for how it will deal with tobacco retailers, the amount of money it will charge in fines, and how long it will prevent the guilty from selling tobacco products.

That document is called the “Draft Guidance for FDA and Tobacco Retailers: Civil Money Penalties and No-Tobacco-Sale Orders For Tobacco Retailers.”

I recommend it as future reading, but be warned, it will cross your eyes.

You can scramble through the maze of federal bureaucratise here, but suffice it to say, it is all gobbledygook and hard to understand.

Just keep in mind that mid-term elections are coming up. Tobacco has few friends. My advice is to remember who are our friends in Congressional, state and local elections and vote accordingly.

Now, back to the promised FDA notes:

Take a look at how the FDA defines tobacco as it prepares to make sweeping rulings:

Tobacco product: The term “tobacco product” means “any product made or derived from tobacco that is intended for human consumption, including any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product (except for raw materials other than tobacco used in manufacturing a component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product).” Section 201(rr) of the FDCA.  This term does not include an article that is a drug, a device, or a combination product as defined in the act. Section 201(rr) of the FDCA. Thus, the term is not limited to products containing tobacco, but also includes components, parts, and accessories of tobacco products, whether they are sold for further manufacturing or for consumer use.  For example, tobacco, papers, and filters are tobacco products, whether they are sold to consumers for use with roll-your-own tobacco or are sold for further manufacturing into a product sold to a consumer, such as a cigarette.

The italicized part of this definition may allow those of us who worry over a proposal by U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) that would allow the federal government to charge federal excise taxes on pipe tobacco that matches the roll-your-own tax, which is more than $24 per pound.

As you may recall, the RYO manufacturers screamed bloody murder when the tax was levied on their product. So, they cleverly began packaging RYO tobacco as “pipe tobacco” to avoid paying the outrageous tax.

Cohen, a political careerist from Memphis who is in a tough race for re-election, proposed matching pipe tobacco with RYO, which would even the playing field for RYO labeled as pipe tobacco. In other words, pipe tobacco’s excise tax fees would rise by 775 percent under the Cohen proposal.

If you have friends in Memphis’s 9th Congressional District, which is 60 percent African American, tell them that Cohen’s tobacco proposal is going to subvert the U.S. Constitution by limiting the civil rights of a segment of society.

He does not deserve the vote and support of the 9th District. At one time, Memphis, which wholly contains the 9th District, was a great cotton and tobacco town. Today, it is more about other forms of business ventures.

Nonetheless, Memphis is a great town in the Delta. It is Tennessee’s largest city. It is a dynamic city with a grand history and deserves better representation than a career politician who cares more about being re-elected than watching out for his constituency.

Although Cohen’s proposal has yet to be voted on, it is still on a Congressional timetable and could yet be passed and sent to the U.S. Senate.

Cohen’s Bill, co-sponsored by Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), is labeled the “Tax Parity Act of 2010.”

I prefer the label, “Tax Piracy Act of 2010.” But, then, I am prejudiced.

The bill was introduced by Cohen and Doggett Jan. 13, and referred to House committee. It has been referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means, where it awaits action.

These things have a way of not going away. Remember that when it comes time to vote.

One other note for “stakeholders” in the FDA’s latest meetings on tobacco.

There is one coming up in Atlanta, Ga., Oct. 3.

Here are the details:

State and Local Tobacco Control Officials Stakeholder Discussion October 3, 2010:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) will hold its first Stakeholder Discussion Series session with State and Local Tobacco Control Officials from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Sunday, October 3, 2010 at:

Emory Conference Center Hotel

1365 Clifton Road Northeast

Atlanta, GA 30322-1013.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) is charged with implementing the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Tobacco Control Act) with the goal of reducing the tremendous toll of disease and death caused by tobacco product use.

In order to better ensure the opportunity for meaningful engagement and dialogue between CTP and State and Local tobacco control officials, a limited number of individuals have been invited to actively participate in the discussion. This approach is based on feedback we have received from stakeholder input on the design of these sessions.

(EDITOR’S NOTE: In other words they don’t want a vocal public presence).

An additional 30 members of the public — or additional representatives from State or Local governments — may observe the session at the meeting site.

To do so, observers must register in advance by sending an email with the subject line of “Registration: October 3” to:

CTPStakeholderSeries@fda.hhs.gov, with first and last name, title and organizational affiliation, as well as a phone number and email address.

Your space will be confirmed with a return email. Registration will remain open until Wednesday, September 29 or until all available spaces are taken, whichever occurs first.

Note that this announcement will be updated if/when space is full.

A conference line will also be provided for additional people to listen via phone.

Call in information will be posted on this website when it is available.

Your Suggestions Needed!

Hang on! We got something for you to do, and this means YOU!

I would like for you to go to our spanking new Tobacco Talk page  and take a look at a new Alcohol, Tobacco and Trade Bureau (TTB) proposal that will eventually distinguish between pipe tobacco and roll-your-own (RYO) cigarette tobacco.

As you probably know, this is crucial for pipe smokers. Pipe tobacco is being taxed by the feds today at $2.8311 per pound and RYO is being hit up for $24.78 per pound. Several congressmen, such as U.S. Rep. Stephen Cohen of Memphis, TN., want to marry pipe tobacco to RYO so the feds can get a 775 percent increase in tax revenue from tobacco.

The TTB has posted the regulations in the Federal Register and has asked for comments. Now, that’s a mighty fine idea.

We want you to do just that, and we will take the best and put them in a letter to the TTB, which will one day rule on the distinguishing characteristics of pipe tobacco vs. RYO. Deadline for the federal comments is September 20, 2010.

We’d like to get your suggestions say by Sept. 10. That will give us time to get through your suggestions, choose the best and write up a nice letter to TTB.

And, by the way, we are joining forces with PipesMagazine.com in this project.

Do not fail to give us your suggestions as to how the federal government should distinguish between pipe tobacco and RYO cigarette tobacco.

You need to do this.

Why? Because your future with your favorite pipe tobacco could very well be at stake. Read the proposed federal regulations. Read what Altadis, Inc., the tobacco giant, has suggested. Get in on the act. This is about you and your pipe tobacco. It is like voting. It is American! A duty! It is the right thing to do!

Trust me on this. Pipesmokers need all the help they can get in this fight.

You can make your suggestions in one of two ways: just post your suggestion in the comment bpc at the end of the TTB Federal Register proposal, which is posted in its entirety in Tobacco Talk.

Or, you can send me an email at editor@pipesmokersintelligencer.org

I will collect the best of these suggestions as to what you would like to see as the best way to define ”pipe tobacco” and send them to PipesMagazine.com as well as compile a PSI list. Between the two of us, PipesMagazine.com and PSI there should be a lot of suggestions as to how this should play out.

Do this today.

Or don’t say you were not amply warned when the big federal sledge hammer falls on your favorite pipe tobacco blend. The feds are after us. This is your opportunity to make your voices heard in one collective shout-out.

Failing to follow through, will place you with the read ‘em and weep crowd.

As for me, give me liberty, or give me. . . Wait, I’m sorry. I lost my train of thought.

You get the idea.